Page 1 of 5
1
Corruption Perceptions Index 2019:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)?
The CPI scores and ranks countries/territories based on how corrupt a country’s
public sector is perceived to be by experts and business executives. It is a composite
index, a combination of 13 surveys and assessments of corruption, collected by a
variety of reputable institutions. The CPI is the most widely used indicator of
corruption worldwide.
Which data sources are used for the CPI?
The 2019 CPI draws on 13 data sources from 12 independent institutions
specialising in governance and business climate analysis. The sources of information
used for the CPI 2019 are based on data published in the previous two years. The
CPI includes only sources that provide a score for a set of countries/territories and
that measure expert perceptions of corruption in the public sector. For a full list of the
data sources, the type of respondents and the specific questions asked, please see
the CPI sources description document.
Why do we need the CPI if there are 13 other sources that measure
manifestations of corruption in the public sector?
There are four properties which make the CPI a valuable governance indicator:
1. The CPI has a global geographical coverage.
2. The CPI is more reliable than each source taken separately because it
compensates for eventual errors among sources by taking the average of at
least three different sources and potentially as many as 13.
3. The CPI, with its 0-100 scale, can differentiate between perceived levels of
corruption with more granularity than sources which, for example, have scales
of 1-7 or 1-10 where each country is assigned a full number.
4. Since the underlying CPI sources assess different dimensions and
manifestations of public sector corruption, the CPI manages to reconcile
different aspects of corruption into one indicator.
Why is the CPI based on perceptions?
Corruption generally comprises illegal activities, which are deliberately hidden and
only come to light through scandals, investigations or prosecutions. Whilst
researchers from academia, civil society and governments have made advances in
terms of objectively measuring corruption in specific sectors, to date there is no
indicator which measures objective national levels of corruption directly and
exhaustively. The sources and surveys which make up the CPI, ask their
respondents questions which are based on carefully designed and calibrated
questionnaires. (For a list of all sources and the questions that they ask, please see
here.) The CPI contains informed views of relevant stakeholders, which generally
correlate highly with objective indicators, such as citizen experiences with bribery as
captured by the Global Corruption Barometer.
Page 2 of 5
2
Which countries/territories are included in the CPI 2019 and why?
For a country/territory to be included in the ranking, it must be included in a minimum
of three of the CPI’s data sources. If a country is not featured in the ranking, then this
is solely because of insufficient survey information and not an indication that
corruption does not exist in the country. This year 180 countries and territories are
included in the index.
What is the difference between a country/territory’s rank and its score?
A country/territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on
a scale of 0-100, where 0 means that a country is perceived as highly corrupt and a
100 means that a country is perceived as very clean. A country's rank indicates its
position relative to the other countries/territories included in the index. Ranks can
change merely if the number of countries included in the index changes.
Which manifestations of corruption does the CPI capture?
CPI source data captures the following aspects of corruption, based on the specific
question wording used to collect the data:
Bribery
Diversion of public funds
Prevalence of officials using public office for private gain without facing
consequences
Ability of governments to contain corruption and enforce effective integrity
mechanisms in the public sector
Red tape and excessive bureaucratic burden which may increase
opportunities for corruption
Meritocratic versus nepotistic appointments in the civil service
Effective criminal prosecution for corrupt officials
Adequate laws on financial disclosure and conflict of interest prevention for
public officials
Legal protection for whistleblowers, journalists, investigators when they are
reporting cases of bribery and corruption
State capture by narrow vested interests
Access of civil society to information on public affairs
For a full list of the questions used by the CPI sources, please see our source
description document here.
Which manifestations of corruption does the CPI not capture?
CPI source data does not capture the following aspects of corruption:
Citizens’ perceptions or experience of corruption
Tax fraud
Illicit financial flows
Enablers of corruption (lawyers, accountants, financial advisors etc)
Money-laundering
Private sector corruption
Informal economies and markets
Is the country/territory with the lowest score the world's most corrupt nation?
No. The CPI is an indicator of perceptions of public sector corruption, i.e.
administrative and political corruption. It is not a verdict on the levels of corruption of
entire nations or societies, or of their policies, or the activities of their private sector.
Citizens of those countries/territories that score at the lower end of the CPI often
show the same concern about and condemnation of corruption as the public in
countries that perform strongly.
Page 3 of 5
3
Further, the country/territory with the lowest score is the one where public sector
corruption is perceived to be greatest among those included in the list. The CPI
provides no information about countries/territories which are not included in the
index.
Can the score of a country in the 2019 CPI be compared with the previous
year?
Yes. As part of the update to the methodology used to calculate the CPI in 2012 we
established the new scale of 0-100. Each country score given by the underlying data
sources is rescaled using the global mean and standard deviation from the CPI 2012
as the year of reference. Using this scale we can compare CPI scores from one year
to the next since 2012. Because of the update in the methodology, however, CPI
scores before 2012 are not comparable over time.
For a more detailed description of the change in methodology in 2012, please see
Corruption Perceptions Index – An updated Methodology for 2012.
Where can I find the full tables of results in a time series format?
You can find this on our website here.
I want to reproduce CPI results for my own publication – do I need to ask
permission?
No. Unless otherwise noted, Transparency International’s content is covered by a
Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 licence. This means you are free to use
our work without contacting us as long as you comply with the terms in the licence.
You comply with the terms of the licence if you credit and link to our material as
follows:
CONTENT TITLE (YEAR) by Transparency International is licensed under CC-BY- ND 4.0
Please link to the TI content under the above mentioned CONTENT TITLE (YEAR).
The attribute “NoDerivs” means that it is not permitted to remix or change the content
under the mentioned licence.
Can I compare results from before 2012?
No, due to a change in our methodology in 2012, results from before that year cannot
be compared. Only CPI results from 2012 onwards can be compared.
Can you compare countries when they are rated by different sources?
Yes. Through our rescaling process, all our sources are brought closer to the global
mean and standard deviation with the baseline of 2012, to allow for cross time
comparison. For a full explanation of our rescaling process, please see our technical
methodology note.
My country has changed CPI score by one or two points? Does that mean
corruption has increased/decreased?
The CPI is a composite indicator, with at least three sources used per country for
calculating the CPI score. For some countries the sources give very similar ratings
while for other countries the sources give a wider range of ratings. We report this
difference using the standard error and upper and lower bounds for the confidence
intervals. Countries which are given similar ratings by the sources will have a smaller
standard error, while countries with a range of source scores will have a larger
standard error. It is unlikely that a one or two point CPI score change would be
Page 4 of 5
4
statistically significant. Statistically significant changes are reported in our excel
tables of results. Please see the excel document labelled “Statistically Significant
Changes”.
Does the CPI tell the full story of corruption in a country?
No. The CPI is limited in scope, capturing perceptions of the extent of corruption in
the public sector, from the perspective of business people and country experts.
Complementing this viewpoint and capturing different aspects of corruption,
Transparency International produces a range of both qualitative and quantitative
research on corruption, both at the global level and at the national level through
Transparency International’s network of national chapters based in over 100
countries around the world.
Complementing the CPI, Transparency International has a range of global, regional
and sectoral research products. Full details can be found on our website.
Have there been any independent checks on the validity of the CPI
methodology?
The European Commission Joint Research Centre undertook an independent audit
of the CPI 2017 and its methodology. The same audit was conducted in 2012
following the introduction of a new methodology for the CPI calculation. Both audits
found that the CPI is conceptually and statistically coherent and has a balanced
structure. The full report and recommendations can be found here.
How are statistically significant changes calculated?
Since 2018, Transparency International uses a revised approach to calculate
standard errors and effect sizes, based on advice from the European Commission
Joint Research Centre. Statistically significant movers are calculated using the effect
size, the standard deviation, and the number of sources used for each country.
Changes in CPI scores are considered statistically significant using a 90%
confidence interval. A full explanation, including all formulas, can be found in the
technical methodology note here.
Page 5 of 5
แบบฟอร์มการขอเผยแพร่ข้อมูลผ่านเว็บไซต์ของหน่วยงานในราชการบริหารส่วนกลาง
สํานักงานปลัดกระทรวงสาธารณสุข
ตามประกาศสํานักงานปลัดกระทรวงสาธารณสุข
เรื่อง แนวทางการเผยแพร่ข้อมูลต่อสาธารณะผ่านเว็บไซต์ของหน่วยงาน พ.ศ. 2561
สําหรับหน่วยงานในราชการบริหารส่วนกลางสํานักงานปลัดกระทรวงสาธารณสุข
แบบฟอร์มการขอเผยแพร่ข้อมูลผ่านเว็บไซต์ของหน่วยงานในสังกัดสํานักงานปลัดกระทรวงสาธารณสุข
ชื่อหน่วยงาน : ศูนย์ปฏิบัติการต่อต้านการทุจริต กระทรวงสาธารณสุข
วัน/เดือน/ปี: 23 มกราคม 2563
หัวข้อ: Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2019
รายละเอียดข้อมูล (โดยสรุปหรือเอกสารแนบ)
Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2019
หมายเหตุ: ............................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................
ผู้รับผิดชอบการให้ข้อมูล ผู้อนุมัติรับรอง
สุชาฎา วรินทร์เวช สุชาฎา วรินทร์เวช
(นางสาวสุชาฎา วรินทร์เวช) (นางสาวสุชาฎา วรินทร์เวช)
ตําแหน่ง นักวิเคราะห์นโยบายและแผนชํานาญการพิเศษ ตําแหน่ง นักวิเคราะห์นโยบายและแผนชํานาญการพิเศษ (หัวหน้า)
วันที่ 23 เดือน มกราคม พ.ศ. 2563 วันที่ 23 เดือน มกราคม พ.ศ. 2563
ผู้รับผิดชอบการนําข้อมูลขึ้นเผยแพร่
พศวีร์ วัชรบุตร
(นายพศวีร์ วัชรบุตร)
นักทรัพยากรบุคคลปฏิบัติการ
วันที่ 23 เดือน มกราคม พ.ศ. 2563